Login to AccuWeather.com Premium Login to AccuWeather.com Professional Login to AccuWeather.com RadarPlus AccuWeather.com
We have updated our Privacy Policy and our Cookie Policy effective May 25, 2018. Please review them.

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Personal Photo
Personal Statement
morpheus27 doesn't have a personal statement currently.
Personal Info
Rank: F5 Superstorm
Age Unknown
66.4 mi W of Montauk, 46.4 mi E of Manhattan
Birthday Unknown
No Information
Joined: 8-December 09
Profile Views: 5,338*
Last Seen: 8th January 2018 - 01:54 PM
Local Time: Jun 25 2018, 05:10 AM
1,302 posts (0 per day)
Contact Information
AIM No Information
Yahoo No Information
ICQ No Information
MSN No Information
* Profile views updated each hour




My Content
7 Feb 2011
Hi Everyone,

I'm not sure if there is a thread dedicated to this yet but I wanted to open a discussion. Below is a link to an article that in particular discusses 'computer code' from the CRU, University of East Anglia.

Working in the field of computers, data mining, coding and programming I'm certainly no stranger to how there can be a tendency to want (or need to?) modify the raw data to support a particular belief, or perhaps more directly alter the data for what are believed to be real-world scenarios.


Can someone with 'climate' knowledge in here present some specific scenarios that require 'any' data whatsoever to be modified or 'fudged' as the article mentions?

Disclaimer: While I certainly have my own position on the AGW topic, I am really trying to put on a nuetral hat for a bit to understand some of the decisions that are made when it comes to interpreting raw data as it's an interesting topic in and of itself. Thanks in advance.

5 Oct 2010
  1. I believe humans impact their environment.
  2. I believe we should work to minimize such impact.
  3. I believe polluting our environment is bad.
  4. I believe that non-polluting energy sources are best. (do any truly exist?)
  5. I do not believe that recent global warming is caused primarily (or in any measurable way) by human activity.
  6. I do not believe that humanity is threatened by Co2 emissions.
  7. I believe that global population stabilization should be of more concern.

Am I a believer or denier?
Last Visitors

22 Sep 2017 - 21:56

11 Sep 2017 - 21:09

11 Sep 2017 - 16:25

11 Mar 2017 - 21:23

23 Jan 2016 - 18:48

Other users have left no comments for morpheus27.


7695 posts
Active: 5th September 2017 - 11:59 PM

2843 posts
Active: 20th May 2018 - 01:32 PM

4606 posts
Active: 21st November 2015 - 01:01 PM

7065 posts
Active: 26th December 2015 - 12:23 PM
View All Friends
RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th June 2018 - 05:10 AM