morpheus27 doesn't have a personal statement currently.
Rank: F5 Superstorm
66.4 mi W of Montauk, 46.4 mi E of Manhattan
Joined: 8-December 09
Profile Views: 2,939*
Last Seen: Yesterday, 01:21 PM
Local Time: Oct 9 2015, 04:58 AM
1,231 posts (1 per day)
* Profile views updated each hour
7 Feb 2011
I'm not sure if there is a thread dedicated to this yet but I wanted to open a discussion. Below is a link to an article that in particular discusses 'computer code' from the CRU, University of East Anglia.
Working in the field of computers, data mining, coding and programming I'm certainly no stranger to how there can be a tendency to want (or need to?) modify the raw data to support a particular belief, or perhaps more directly alter the data for what are believed to be real-world scenarios.
Can someone with 'climate' knowledge in here present some specific scenarios that require 'any' data whatsoever to be modified or 'fudged' as the article mentions?
Disclaimer: While I certainly have my own position on the AGW topic, I am really trying to put on a nuetral hat for a bit to understand some of the decisions that are made when it comes to interpreting raw data as it's an interesting topic in and of itself. Thanks in advance.
5 Oct 2010
Am I a believer or denier?
1 Oct 2015 - 20:31
4 Mar 2015 - 15:20
14 Feb 2015 - 18:18
4 Feb 2015 - 20:24
13 Feb 2014 - 7:11
Other users have left no comments for morpheus27.
|Lo-Fi Version||Time is now: 9th October 2015 - 03:58 AM|